Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Linguistics

No. 6 (2024): Scientific journal of the Fergana State University (Social humanities sciences)

THE EXPRESSION OF CULTURE, CUSTOMS AND FORMS OF ETIQUETTE BY USING NON-VERBAL MEANS IN SPEECH

Submitted
January 24, 2025
Published
2025-01-24

Abstract

This article examines the expression of national culture, customs, and forms of etiquette through nonverbal means in interpersonal communication in Uzbek, English, Turkish, and Russian languages. It explores speech culture, spirituality, and social behavior of people across these four languages. Customs and forms of etiquette associated with the use of nonverbal communication were classified into separate groups based on their conditions of application, purposes, interrelations, content, and social moral requirements. Furthermore, an analysis was conducted on nonverbal means reflecting the universally accepted language of communication, customs, values, or culture formed over centuries, considering the geographic location of the languages studied. The article also includes opinions of scholars emphasizing the significant role of the system of customs and national culture used in nonverbal communication in promoting these aspects on the global stage.

References

  1. Дюма А. Три мушкетера. –М.: ЛитРес, 2015. − 680 стр. (Dumas A. Tri mushketera. M.: LitRes, 2015. − P. 680)
  2. Николаева Т., Успенский Б. Языкознание и паралингвистика // Лингвистические исследования по общей и славянской типологии. −М.: Наука, 1966. − 63-74 стр. (T.Николаева, Б.Успенский. Языкознание и паралингвистика // Лингвистические исследования по общей и славянской типологии. − M.: Наука, 1966. − Стр. 63-74)
  3. Пиз А. Язык телодвижений. −М.: Эксмо-през, 2010. − 258 стр. (Pease A. Yazik telodvijeniy. −M.: Eksmo-pres, 2010. −P. 258)
  4. Питерский Я. Перспектива смерти. − Киев: ИП Стрельбицкого, 2015. − 320 стр. (Я Питерский. Перспектива смерти. −Kиев: ИП Стрельбицкого, 2015. − С. 320)
  5. Садохин А. Введение в теорию межкультурной коммуникации. −М.: КноРус, 2014. − 254 стр. (Садохин А. Введение в теорию межкультурной коммуникации. −M.: KnoRus, 2014. − С. 254)
  6. Ahmedov B. Amir Temur. –T.: Abdulla Qodiriy nomidagi xalq merosi nashriyoti, 1995. – 640 b.
  7. Dikici A. Geleneklerin toplumdaki yeri ve önemi. Fitrat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11 (2). ELAZIĞ, 2001. − S. 253.
  8. Dostoevsky F. Crime and Punishment. Penguin Classics, 2002. – P. 634.
  9. Dumas A. The Three Musketeers. Modern Library, 2001. − P. 625
  10. Güntekin R. Çalikuşu. Istanbul, 2017. − S. 381
  11. Nurmonov A. Tanlangan asarlar. 1-jild. −T.: Akademnashr, 2012. − 403 b.
  12. Oйбек. Қутлуғ қон. Учинчи том. –T.: Ғофур Ғулом номидаги бадиий адабиёт нашриёти, 1969. − 390 б.
  13. Poyatos F. Nonverbal Communication across Disciplines. Amsterdam /Philadelphia. John Benjamins B.V., 2002. − P. 474
  14. Қодирий A. Ўткан кунлар. −T.: Ғофур Ғулом номидаги бадиий адабиёт нашриёти, 1974. – 494 б.
  15. Saidxonov M. Aloqa-aralashuv va imo-ishoralar. −T.: Fan, 2008. − 83 b.
  16. Stoker B. Drakula. Çeviren: Pinar Güncan − Istanbul: Bordo Siyah Yayinlari, 2018. − S. 624
  17. Trimbur J. The Call to Write, Brief Fifth Edition. − Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. 2011. – P. 627.
  18. Türklerin gelmiş geçmiş en eski gelenekleri//URL:www.yenisafak. com/foto-galeri/hayat/turklerin-gelmis-gecmis-en-eski-gelenekleri-2032725)
  19. Warnke A. (Ne) zabitiye slavyanskiye obryadi i obichai // URL: culture.pl/ru/article/ nezabytye-slavyanskie-obryady-i-obychai