METONYMIC MODELING OF BUSINESS DISCOURSE
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores metonymic modeling in business discourse, examining how metonymy functions to streamline, convey, and influence communication within various business contexts. By analyzing a diverse corpus of business-related texts, including corporate communications, financial reports, and marketing materials, the study identifies key metonymic expressions and categorizes their functions. The findings reveal that metonymy enhances communication efficiency by simplifying complex concepts, facilitates branding and corporate identity through symbolic representations, and aids in the clear discussion of financial phenomena. Sector-specific variations in metonymic usage highlight how different industries leverage metonymy to meet their unique communication needs. The study underscores the significance of metonymy in creating shared understandings and shaping perceptions within the business environment. It also suggests areas for future research, including broader and more quantitative analyses, and the exploration of metonymy’s interplay with other linguistic devices. Overall, this article provides valuable insights into the role of metonymy as a cognitive and communicative tool in business discourse, offering implications for improving communication strategies and understanding organizational dynamics.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Boers F., & Demecheleer M. Metaphor and metonymy in business discourse / Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 2001. – P. 431-452.
Charteris-Black J. The communication of financial concepts through metonymy / English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 2004. – P. 295-311.
Cova B. & Cova V. Branded spaces: The socio-spatial formation of brands and branding / European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 2002. – P. 690-709.
Kövecses Z. Metaphor: A practical introduction. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. – 375 p.
Krennmayr T. Metonymy in business discourse: An exploratory study / Discourse & Communication, 5(3), 2011. – P. 317-332.
Lakoff G. & Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. – USA: University of Chicago Press, 1980. – 308 p.
Азнаурьян, Б.Э. Когнитивно-прагматические особенности делового дискурса: Дисс. …канд.филол.наук/ Б.Э. Азнаурьян. – Краснодар, 2005. – 330 с.
Баландина, Н.А. Дискурс переговоров в англоязычной деловой коммуникации: Дисс. … канд.филол.наук/ Н.А. Баландина. – Волгоград, 2004. – 192 с.
Безнаева, О.А. Когнитивно-прагматические особенности представления информации в деловом дискурсе: на материале англоязычной деловой корреспонденции: дисс. ... канд. филол. наук. – Архангельск, 2009. – 183 с.
Ширяева Т.А. Деловой дискурс: сущность, признаки, структура [Текст]/ Т.А. Ширяева // Вестник ПГЛУ, 2010. - №2. С. 118-122.