BO‘LAJAK BOSHLANG‘ICH TA’LIM O‘QITUVCHILARINING KASBIY RIVOJLANTIRISHDA ZAMONAVIY PEDAGOGIK TEXNOLOGIYALARNING SAMARADORLIGI

Mahfuza G‘ofurova

doi:10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a4

Authors

Mahfuza G‘ofurova

Farg‘ona davlat universiteti

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-1032

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a4

Keywords:

SBITT, reflective teaching, portfolio, professional development, pedagogical technologies, effectiveness., functional literacy, didactic tools, primary education, future teachers, pedagogical approach, students, determining ways to solve various problems and assignments.

Abstract

This article explores the effectiveness of modern pedagogical technologies in the professional development of prospective primary school teachers. Pedagogical technologies contribute to the individualization of the learning process, the development of students’ creative thinking and reflective activities, as well as the formation of their professional competencies. The findings indicate that the systematic use of modern technologies is a crucial factor in enhancing the functional literacy of future teachers. The article provides an in-depth analysis of the theoretical and methodological foundations of modern pedagogical technologies that contribute to the professional development of prospective primary school teachers — SBITT, reflective teaching, and the portfolio method. Their application in international practice, as well as the indicators of their effectiveness, are thoroughly examined.

Author Biography

Mahfuza G‘ofurova, Farg‘ona davlat universiteti

Farg‘ona davlat universiteti, boshlang‘ich ta’lim uslubiyoti kafedrasi pedagogika fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD)

References

1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Farmoni. 2022-2026 yillarga mo‘ljallangan Yangi O‘zbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasini “Insonga e’tibor va sifatli ta’lim yili”da amalga oshirishga oid davlat dasturi to‘g‘risida. 2023-yil 28-fevral

2.Jabborova O. Boshlang‘ich ta’lim metodikasining yangi nazariy masalalari. – Toshkent, 2022.

3. Ефремова Н. Ф. Организatsiя оценивания компетенций студентов, приступающих к освоению основных образовательных программ вузов. Рекомендatsiи для вузов, приступающих к переходу на компетентностное обучение студентов. М.: Исследовательский центр проблем качества Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2

4. Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., McIntyre, A., Sato, M., & Zeichner, K. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.

5. OECD. (2019). OECD skills outlook 2019: Thriving in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en

6. Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

7. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

8. Xolmatova, N. (2020). Boshlang‘ich ta’limda sistemali-blokli innovatsion texnologiyalarni qo‘llash metodikasi. O‘zMU Ilmiy axborotlari, 1(2), 112–118.

9. Yurdabakan, İ., & Erdoğan, T. (2009). The effects of portfolio assessment on reading, listening and writing skills of secondary school prep class students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(3), 98–107.