logo
O‘zbekcha

COMPARISON OF POLITENESS STRATEGIES AND CULTURAL NORMS IN ANGLO-SAXON AND UZBEK FAMILY DISCOURSE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss3/a126

Keywords:

politeness, impoliteness, values, Anglo-Saxon linguistic culture, Uzbek linguistic culture, family discourse, communicative style

Abstract

Politeness, while often regarded as a universal concept, is understood and practiced differently across cultures, as demonstrated by numerous cross-cultural studies. Communication styles are shaped by cultural values, which determine the way people interact. This study aims to investigate the perceptions of politeness among the English and Uzbeks and to explore how cultural values influence the nature of interpersonal interactions within the family context in these cultures. Data were collected using a sociocultural questionnaire, a discourse completion test (DCT) administered to 100 English and Uzbek participants, and ethnographic observations. The analysis was conducted through the lens of (im)politeness theory, speech act theory, cross-cultural pragmatics, discourse analysis, identity construction research, and the impact of politeness on communication styles. The findings indicate that Anglo-Saxon culture places high value on privacy, distance, and equality, whereas Uzbek culture emphasizes closeness, respect for age, and status. The results further revealed that parent-child interactions in the Anglo-Saxon context are typically egalitarian, with children treating parents as equals, which reflects the low power distance characteristic of this culture. Conversely, Uzbek culture exhibits marked differences in communicative practices in hierarchical relationships, indicating a higher power distance.

Author Biography

  • Шахноза Артикова, Ферганский государственный университет

    Ферганский государственный университет преподаватель

References

Вежбицкая, А. Язык. Культура. Познание / пер. с англ. — М.: Русские словари, 1996. — 416 с.

Ларина, Т. В. Категория вежливости и стиль коммуникации: сопоставление английских и русских лингвокультурных традиций. — М.: Рукописные памятники Древней Руси, 2009. — 368 с.

Ларина, Т. В. Англичане и русские: Язык, культура, коммуникация. — М.: Языки славянских культур, 2013. — 432 с.

Тер-Минасова, С. Г. Язык и межкультурная коммуникация, часть II. Язык как орудие культуры. — М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 2008. — 280 с.

Формановская, Н. И. Речевой этикет и культура общения. — М.: Высшая школа, 1989. — 207 с.

Blum-Kulka, S. The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society // In: Watts, R. J., Ide, S., Ehlich, K. (Eds.). Politeness in Languages: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. — Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992. — Pp. 81-255.

Brown, P., Levinson, S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. 2nd ed. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. — 345 p.

Feng, H. Politeness across Cultures // The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. — Wiley Online Library, 2017. — Available at: https://www.wiley.com (accessed: 13.10.2024).

Guirdham, M. How cultures differ: Explanation of cultural differences // Communicating across Cultures. — In: Larina, T. Intercultural Communication: Theory and Practice. — London: Palgrave, 1999. — Pp. 48-52.

Huang, Y. Politeness principle in cross-culture communication // English Language Teaching. — 2008. — Vol. 1, No. 1. — Pp. 96-101.

Jandt, F. An introduction to intercultural communication: Identities in a global community. 4th ed. — California, USA: Sage, 2003. — 368 p.

Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics. — London; New York: Longman, 1983. — 250 p.

Leech, G., Larina, T. Politeness: West and East // Вестник РУДН. Серия «Лингвистика». — 2014. — № 4. — С. 9-34.

Sifianou, M. Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A crosscultural perspective. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992. — 282 p.

Watts, R. Politeness. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. — 307 p.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF POLITENESS STRATEGIES AND CULTURAL NORMS IN ANGLO-SAXON AND UZBEK FAMILY DISCOURSE. (2025). Scientific Journal of the Fergana State University, 31(3), 126. https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss3/a126