Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Linguistics

No. 3 (2024): Scientific journal of the Fergana State University. Application set (Social humanities sciences)

USE OF INTERACTIVE METHODS IN TEACHING ENGLISH FOR TOURISM PURPOSES

Submitted
September 10, 2024
Published
2024-09-12

Abstract

This article aims to provide an overview of interactive methods of teaching English to students in the field of tourism, which has been developing significantly in recent times. The article is divided into two parts: the first part presents the importance of the English language in this field and the specific features of teaching a foreign language oriented to the profession; and in the second part, modern interactive methods used by teachers during foreign language lessons and to increase students' motivation to learn a language are interpreted. The experience of English language teachers of non-philological higher educational institutions shows that the organization of speech interaction in the lesson using traditional work methods and forms is not always effective. Today, the use of interactive methods and methods of teaching foreign language specialists of all fields shows its relevance. Practice shows that the use of interactive methods and methods in foreign language classes relieves the nervous tension of language learners, learns forms of activity allows to change, to focus on the main issues of the topic of employment. After all, the quality of the material supply and the efficiency of its acquisition will increase significantly, and as a result, the motivation of students to learn a foreign language will increase.

References

  1. Augustine, D.K., Gruber, K. D., & Hanson, L. R. (1989–1990). Cooperation works! Educational Leadership, 47, 4–7.
  2. Chiu, M. M. (2008).Flowing toward correct contributions during groups' mathematics problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17 (3), 415–463.
  3. Deutsch, Morton (1949). «A theory of cooperation and competition». Human Relations. 2: 129–152.
  4. Heeden, T. 2003. The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology 31 (3): 325–332.
  5. Johnson, D.W. (2009). «An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning». Educational Researcher. 38 (5): 365–379.
  6. Chen, P. C., Chiu, W. Y., & Lin, T. Y. (2011). A study constructing a holistic English for specific purposes (ESP) curriculum model for tourism and hospitality English. Education Research Journal, 1(5), 84-93.
  7. Chen, W. (2009). A pilot study of some ROCMA cadets’ difficulties in English speaking. WHAMPOA–An Interdisciplinary Journal, 58, 119-126.
  8. Clarvie, M., Charles, S., & Hassan, F. (2013). “I doesn’t know English”: Beliefs and practices in the teaching of speaking in ESL classroom. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(2), 449-460.
  9. Coskun, A. (2009). An ESP course for tourism students. ESP World, 4(25), 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.espworld info/Articles_25/An_ESP_Course_for_Tourism_Students.pdf
  10. Bobanovic, M. K., & Grzinic, J. (2011). The importance of English language skills in the tourism sector: A comparative study of students/employees perceptions in Croatia. Almatourism-Journal of Tourism, Culture and Territorial Development, 2(4), 10-23.
  11. Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In adult ESL programme design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press