sg

Biology

No. 5 (2023): FarDU ilmiy xabarlari jurnali (Aniq va tabiiy fanlar)

INFLUENCE OF FOOD PLANTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MYTHIMNA UNIPUNCTA

Submitted
January 6, 2024
Published
2024-01-08

Abstract

The influence of various food plants on the development and morphological characteristics of Mythimna
unipuncta has been studied. Indicators, morphometric features and coefficient of variation of the Mythimna unipuncta
caterpillar feeding on Zea mays, Capsicum annuum, Rumex confertus differ. In this regard, the quality and physical
properties of food plants are of particular importance. All morphometric indicators of Mythimna unipuncta caterpillars
developed on corn are higher than those of sorrel samples, and they also differ in a high degree of pupal formation and
development of butterflies from them. Despite this, the sorrel plant is important for the survival of phytophages during
periods of nutrient shortage.

References

  1. Altizer S, Davis AK. Populations of monarch butterflies with different migratory behaviors show divergence in
  2. wing morphology. Evolution, 2010. Vol. 64. – P. 1018-1028.
  3. Boggs CL., Freeman KD. Larval food limitation in butterflies: Effects on adult resource allocation and fitness.
  4. Oecologia, 2005. Vol. 144. – P. 353-361.
  5. Caroline S. Awmack and Simon R. Leather. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous Insects. Annu.
  6. Rev. Entomol., 2002. Vol. 47. – P. 817-844.
  7. Davis AK, Chi J, Bradley CA, Altizer S. The redder the better: wing color predicts flight performance in
  8. monarch butterflies. PloS ONE, 2012. Vol. 7: e41323.
  9. Johnson H, Solensky MJ, Satterfield DA, Davis AK. Does Skipping a Meal Matter to a Butterfly’s
  10. Appearance? Effects of Larval Food Stress on Wing Morphology and Color in Monarch Butterflies. PLoS ONE, 2014.
  11. Vol. 9(4): e93492.
  12. Kelly L., & Debinski, D. Effects of Larval Food-limitation on Vanessa cardui Linnaeus (Lepidoptera:
  13. Nymphalidae). The American Midland Naturalist, 1999. Vol. 141 (2). – P. 315-322.
  14. Novri N., Hasmiandy H, Eka C.L., Yunisman Y, Hidrayani H, Dwi Monica W.S. Several local food plants with
  15. the potential as hosts for Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biodiversitas, 2022. Vol. 23 (3). – P. 1693-
  16. Shermatov M.R. Tut pаrvоnаsi (Glyphodes pyloalis Walker) o`zgаruvchаnligigа оzuqа o`simligining tа`siri.
  17. O`zbekiston biologiya jurnali, 2009. №6. – B. 19-22.
  18. Yoshida K., Murakami M. Larval Morphology and Feeding Behavior in Notodontidae (Lepidoptera) in
  19. Relation to Leaf Toughness of Host Plants. Eurasian J. For. Res., 2012. Vol. 15(1). – P. 45-52.
  20. Лакин Г.Ф. Биометрия. Учебное пособие для биол. cпец. Вузов, 4-е изд., перераб. и доп.- М.: Высшая
  21. школа, 1990. – 352 с.
  22. Хўжаев Ш.Т. Ўсимликларни зараркунандалардан уйғунлашган ҳимоя қилиш ҳамда агротоксикология
  23. асослари. – Тошкент, 2014. - 540 б.

Most read articles by the same author(s)