logo
O‘zbekcha

COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS: BASIC APPROACHES AND CONCEPTS

Mualliflar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss3/a137

Kalit so‘zlar:

vizual kognitiv fe’llar, o‘zbek tili, ingliz tili, semantik tahlil, morfologik xususiyatlar, sintaktik tuzilma, kognitiv tilshunoslik, idrok, ko‘rish jarayoni, qiyosiy tahlil, polisemiya, metafora.

Annotatsiya

This article examines the formation, development and significance of cognitive linguistics in modern linguistics. The author summarizes the views of English and Uzbek linguists on cognitive linguistics and the stages of its formation. Cognitive linguistics emerged in the 1970s as a protest against formal linguistic approaches. Its basis goes back to the development of cognitive science in the 1960s and 1970s, such as human categorization and gestalt psychology. Although the initial research in this area was carried out by a small number of scientists, in the 1990s the number of cognitive linguists increased, and the Journal of Cognitive Linguistics and the International Society for Cognitive Linguistics were founded.

Cognitive linguistics is an approach based on general principles, views and hypotheses, rather than a specific theory. This approach aims to study conceptualization patterns, considering language as a mirror of human thinking. The hypothesis that language reflects the structure and properties of human consciousness forms the methodological basis of this field.

The article emphasizes the inextricable link between cognitive linguistics and social, cultural and linguistic processes. This direction is developing in collaboration with various disciplines, including psychology, anthropology, philosophy and computer science, opening up new opportunities for scientific research. Cognitive linguistics is aimed at studying the mechanisms of storing, expressing and transmitting knowledge through language, which is of great importance in studying the grammar of thought of Uzbek speakers. The article shows cognitive linguistics as a product of interdisciplinary dialogue and determines its place in scientific research. This article provides a detailed description of the stages of formation of cognitive linguistics in English and Uzbek linguistics.

Muallif haqida

  • , Farg‘ona davlat universiteti

    Farg‘ona davlat universiteti, Ingliz tili amliy kursi kafedrasi katta o‘qituvchisi PhD

Adabiyotlar

Балашова Е.Ю. Концепты любовь и ненависть в русском и американском языковых сознаниях. Автореф. дис… канд. филол. наук. Саратов, 2004. – С. 6

Бодуэн де Куртуне И.А. Количественность в языковом мышлении // Избранные труды по общему языкознанию. Ч. 1. М., 1963. – С. 312

Кравченко А.В. Знак, значение, знание. Очерк когнитивной философии языка. – Иркутск: ИГУ, 2001. – N 1. – С. 60

Кубрякова Е.С. Об установках когнитивной науки и актуальных проблемах когнитивной лингвистики. / Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. –2004, № 1. – С.6-17.;

Кубрякова Е.С., Демьянков В.З., Панкрац Ю.Г., Лузина Л.Г. Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов. М., 1996. – Сс. 53-55

Нурмонов А, Йўлдошев Б. Тилшунослик ва табиий фанлар. – Тошкент: Шарқ нашриёти, 2001. 160б. – Б. 19

Сафаров Ш. Когнитив тилшунослик. Жиззах, “Сангзор”, 2006. – Б.5

Степанов Ю.С. Основы общего языкознания. М., 1975.; Карасик В. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. М., 2004.;

Carroll D.W. Psychology of language. – Thomson, 2004. – P. 492

Chomskiy N. Language and mind. – Cambridge University press, 2006.

Chomsky N. Syntactic structures. – Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002. [1957] 117p. jami

Fillmore C.J. “An alternative to checklist theories of meaning.” Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1. – London, 1975;

Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. – United KingdoM: University of Chicago Press, 2008. – P. 11

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

Montague R. “Universal Grammar.” Theoria, 36: 373-398. – London, 1970.

Yuklab olishlar

Nashr etilgan

2025-06-25

Qanday iqtibos keltirish

COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS: BASIC APPROACHES AND CONCEPTS. (2025). Scientific Journal of the Fergana State University, 31(3), 137. https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss3/a137