METAPHORICAL DIMENSIONS: EXPLORING THE COGNITIVE AND CULTURAL FOUNDATIONS OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE

Abdulxay Qosimov

doi:10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a88

Авторы

Abdulxay Qosimov

Fergana State University

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-0813

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a88

Ключевые слова:

теория концептуальной метафоры, когнитивная лингвистика, культурная когниция, межкультурная коммуникatsiя, образный язык

Аннотация

В данном исследовании рассматривается роль метафор в языке и культуре, демонстрируя, что метафоры представляют собой не просто стилистический прием, а фундаментальный когнитивный инструмент. На основе анализа теорий и метафорических выражений в разных культурах показано, что метафоры связывают абстрактное и конкретное, формируют знание и сохраняют культурные ценности. Результаты подтверждают существование универсальных когнитивных моделей и культурно-специфических вариatsiй метафор.

Биография автора

Abdulxay Qosimov, Fergana State University

PhD, Teacher of Applied English department, Fergana State University

Библиографические ссылки

1. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. – 242 p.

2. Kövecses Z. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. – 314 p.

3. Gibbs R.W. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. – 348 p.

4. Aziz-Zadeh L., Damasio A. Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging // Journal of Physiology-Paris. – 2008. – Vol. 102, № 1-3. – P. 35-39.

5. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. – 233 p.

6. Quinn N. The Cultural Basis of Metaphor // Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology / Ed. by J.W. Fernandez. – Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991. – P. 56-93.

7. Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time // Cognitive Psychology. – 2001. – Vol. 43, № 1. – P. 1-22.

8. Charteris-Black J. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. – 263 p.

9. Musolff A. Metaphor scenarios in public discourse // Metaphor and Symbol. – 2006. – Vol. 21, № 1. – P. 23-38.

10. Sweetser E. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 174 p.

11. Deignan A. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005. – 235 p.

12. Sharifian F. Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. – 238 p.

13. Pragglejaz Group. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse // Metaphor and Symbol. – 2007. – Vol. 22, № 1. – P. 1-39.

14. Evans V. The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. – 286 p.

15. Kövecses Z. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. – 223 p.

16. Matsuki K. Metaphors of anger in Japanese // Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World / Ed. by J.R. Taylor, R.E. MacLaury. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995. – P. 137-151.

17. Chilton P., Lakoff G. Foreign policy by metaphor // Language and Peace / Ed. by C. Schäffner, A. Wenden. – Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1995. – P. 37-59.

18. Wilken R. The Critical Reception of Metaphors of the Internet // International Journal of Communication. – 2013. – Vol. 7. – P. 1253-1273.

19. Wodak R. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – 252 p.

20. Santa Ana O. Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. – Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002. – 402 p.

21. Forceville C. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research // Multimodal Metaphor / Ed. by C. Forceville, E. Urios-Aparisi. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. – P. 19-42.

22. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition // Annual Review of Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 59. – P. 617-645.

23. Zinken J. Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies // Cognitive Linguistics. – 2007. – Vol. 18, № 3. – P. 445-466.

24. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. – New York: Basic Books, 2002. – 440 p.

25. Gibbs R.W. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. – 527 p.