Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Pedogogical

No. 6 (2024): Scientific journal of the Fergana State University ADDITIONAL COLLECTION (Social humanities sciences)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM LEARNING.

Submitted
January 31, 2025
Published
2025-02-03

Abstract

The rise of the online learning modality has transformed the educational landscape, providing flexibility and convenience, but calls into question its efficacy when compared to the more traditional form of physical interaction with students. This article investigates to address this gap by juxtaposing these internalization strategies with the help of relevant theories, empirical data and important findings. The paper examines the cognitive, constructivist and socio-cultural approaches in order to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of online and classroom teaching. Finally, the article integrates the findings of several studies to reflect the relationship between particular approaches used and the students’ academic performance and involvement in the learning process.

References

  1. Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? “International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning”, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v6i1.174
  2. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Wozney, L., Fiset, M. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. “Review of Educational Research”, 74(3), 379-439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
  3. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. “American Journal of Distance Education”, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640009527071
  4. GARRISON, D., & ANDERSON, T. (2004). A framework for research and practice. Journal of Distance Learning, 8(1).
  5. Mayer, R. E. (2009). “Multimedia learning” (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  6. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2010). “Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies.” U.S. Department of Education. ttps://doi.org/10.1037/e530272011-001
  7. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2003). Cognitive load measurements as a means to advance cognitive load theory. “Educational Psychologist”, 38(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
  8. Piaget, J. (1970). “The science of education and the psychology of the child”. Orion Press.
  9. Sweller, J. (1988). “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.” Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
  10. Shea, P., Sau Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190.
  11. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). “Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes” Harvard University Press.
  12. Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The Mediating Role of Self-Eddicacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265