NOMINATIVE FIELD OF THE CONCEPT “FOOT/OYOQ” IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK
Keywords:
concept, linguistic picture of the world, nominative field, field constituents, key word-representor, derivate, lexical-semantical variations (LSV), semantic attribute, language and speech units, dominant, central and periphery members of the field, associative unitsAbstract
The article deals with the study of the linguistic picture of the nominative field “foot/oyoq”, characteristics and the relations of the constituent units of the field in English and Uzbek.
Empiric observations showed that the semantic structure and linguistic forms of expression differ from nation to nation. Our studies let us discover the following verbalizers in English and Uzbek: lexemes (words, phraseological units, paremies), syntaxemes (word combinations, sentences, micro and macro texts) and paralinguistic means. Among parts of speech the verb is considered to be the dominant in English and Uzbek.
Statistic and componential analysis showed that word combinations (phrasemes) occupy the center of the field as the dominant, phraseological units, sentences and words – the central, morphemes, texts, proverbs and sayings, paralinguistic means the periphery zone of the field. The results say that English and Uzbek languages have their own mode of categorization and conceptualization which is based on the historical and national traditions and we can conclude that determining the nominative field is the primary task in the study of the semantic relations of the units that make it up.
References
Зацепина Е.А. Номинативное поле как объективация концепта. Вестник ВГУ. Серия: Филология. Журналистика.2007,№1-с.36 (Zatsepina E.A. Nominative field as the objectization of the concept. VSU Newsletter. Series: Philology. Journalism. 2007, Volume 1-p.36)
Ipsen, G. Der Alte Orient und die Indogermanen/ Festschrift fur W. Streitberg. Heidelberg, 1924.-p.225
Филичева Н.И. Синтактические поля.Высшая школа, 1977.-15 с.
( N.I.Filicheva. Syntactical fields.Visshaya shkola, 1977-p.15)
Гулыга Е.В, Шендельс Е.И. Грамматико-лексические поля в современном немецком языке. М., «Просвещение», 1969- 8с.(Guliga E.V, Shendels E.I. Grammatical-lexical fields in modern German. Moscow, “Prosvesheniye”-p.8)
Попова З.Д. Семантико-когнитивный анализ языка. З.Д.Попова., И.А.Стернин.- Воронеж, 2006-226с (Popova Z.D. Semantical cognitive analysis of the language.Voronej,2006- p.226)
Комаров. А.П. О лингвистическом статусе казуальной связи. Алма-Ата. 1970. 240 с. (Komarov A.P. About linguistic status of the casual link. Alma-Ata.1970-p.240)
Oxford Dictionary of Advanced English. Oxford University Press. 10th edition. 2020- p.615
Кунин А.В. Англо-русский фразеологический словарь.Том 1. Москва: Советская энциклопедия, 1967. – 580 с.(Kunin A.V. English-Russian phraseological dictionary. Volume I. Moscow. Soviet Encyclopedia, 1967-p.580)
O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. 2- том. Moskva. “Russskiy yazik” .1981.522 б. (Monolingual dictionary of Uzbek. Volume II, Moscow. “Russian language”. 1981-p.522)
Internet manba’lari:
www.oup.com/elt
www.relatedwords.io
www.dictionary.com
www.thesaurus.com/brows
www.dictionary.cambridge.org
www.macmillandictionary.com
www.marriam-webster.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientific journal of the Fergana State University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.