sg

Linguistics

No. 1 (2022): Scientific journal of the Fergana State University

USE OF UNIONS WITH BIRD NAMES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORNITONYMS

Submitted
July 11, 2023
Published
2023-07-11

Abstract

The connotations of a particular language subject are strongly influenced by various cultural, environmental, social, religious, and political factors, as opposed to its denotations. Accordingly, any analysis of the connotations of linguistic elements provides insight to understand language-specific parameters and to identify nonlinguistic similarities and differences between languages. The study of the metaphorical use of ornithonyms can shed light on language-specific cultural models that refer to connotations of specific animal terms to define human characteristics. An analysis of the use of bird name metaphors usually leads to an important understanding of the dominant cultural model of a particular society. This article discusses these issues and analyzes the features of the use of ornithonyms in two languages ​​in terms of differences and similarities.

References

  1. Domínguez, P. & Málaga, U. (2006). Animal names used as insults and derogation in Polish and Spanish. Philologia Hispalensis, 20, 137-174.
  2. Berlin B, Breedlove DE, Raven PH 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75: 214–242.
  3. Cambridge English dictionary.
  4. Reverso Context Dictionary.
  5. Fiodorov, A. F. (2004). Birds of our winged friends. Yoshkar-Ola.
  6. Kilyeni, A. and Silaški, N. (2014). Beauty and the beast from a cognitive linguistic perspective: Animal metaphors for women in Serbian and Romanian. Gender Studies, 13(1), 163-178.
  7. Kövecses, Z. (2003). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Kreidler, C. (1998). Introducing English semantics. London: Routledge.
  9. Lakoff, G. & Johnsen, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd edn.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. semantics. Nauka: Moscow.
  10. Cowie, A. P. (1998). Phraseology, Theory, Analysis, and applications. Clarendon press: Oxford.
  11. Soboleva, N. P. (2016). Translation of phraseological units used in film taglines, Linguoculturological aspect. Journal of Language and Literature, 7(2): 348-52
  12. Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  13. Gerasimova, O.I. (1991). Birds are my friends. Yoshkar-Ola.
  14. Kubryakova, E.S. (1977). Theory of nomination and word formation / Language nominations. Moscow: Nauka. Vasiliev, V.N. (1985).
  15. Teliya, V. N. (1986). The connotative aspect of nominative semantics. Nauka: Moscow.
  16. Linklar:
  17. https://parenting.firstcry.com/articles/50-bird-names-for-your-gorgeousbaby-girl/
  18. https://uzbekistan.birds.watch/v2photo.php?l=en&s=000700137&n=1&si=uzb
  19. https://uz.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qizilishtonlar
  20. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cock
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language
  22. https://ismlar.com/name/To%E2%80%98ti
  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_of_prey