The scientist of the early Renaissance, the genius Abu Nasr Farabi, revived ancient Greek philosophy, enriched it with new philosophical theories and conclusions, created Eastern Muslim philosophy. Farabi studied the origins of ancient Greek culture with the help of the works of such philosophers as Aristotle, Plato, Ptolemy. He also studied the culture of the peoples of Sogd, Khorasan, the Sassanid state, the Kushan state among nomadic tribes. The thinker created a unified and logically complete philosophical thinking. He based it on a person and his creative activity. Man as the cause of all creatures created by God, His behavior manifests itself in the mind inherent only in humanity. The question of cognitive activity of scientific, philosophical and spiritual-moral views of the thinker is discussed in connection with the point of view of achieving happiness by a person. The importance of studying, analyzing and implementing the views highlighted in the teachings of Abu Nasr Farabi is scientifically substantiated as the main goal of building a renewing society in Uzbekistan and the process of educating a harmonious personality. This article describes the expression of knowledge in the philosophy of Abu Nasr Farabi. We can see his pantheistic views in the theoretical analysis of reason.
References
Abu Nasr Forobiy. Fozil odamlar shahri. T. Abdulla Qodiriy nomidagi xalq merosi nashriyoti, 1993. (Abu Nasr Farabi. City of noble people. T. People’s heritage publishing house named after Abdullah Kadiri, 1993)
Юлдашев Ф.Ю. Концепция познания аль-Фараби в истории философии. «Философия инноваций и социология будущего в пространстве культуры: научный диалог». Сборник статей Всероссийской научно-практической конференции с международным участием. Уфа, 2020 год. Стр. 389-393 (Yuldashev F.Y. The concept of cognition of al-Farabi in the history of philosophy. “Philosophy of innovation and sociology of the future in the space of culture: scientific dialogue”. Collection of articles of Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation. Ufa, 2020. pp. 389-393)
Yuldashev, F. A. Abu Nasr Forobiyning aql va bilim evolyusiyasi haqidagi qarashlari: falsafa fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (РhD) dissertatsiyasi: 09.00.03 - falsafa tarixi / F. A. Yuldashev; Samarqand Davlat universiteti. - Samarqand, 2018. - 134 bet (Yuldashev, F. A. Abu Nasr Farabi’s views on the evolution of reason and knowledge: PhD dissertation: 09.00.03 - history of philosophy / F. A. Yuldashev; Samarkand State University. - Samarkand, 2018. - Page 134)
Yuldashev F. A. Forobiy qarashlarida baxt-saodat tushunchasining ifodalanishi //Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №. 10-2. – С. 528-533. (Yuldashev F. A. Expression of the concept of happiness in Farabi’s views //Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. – 2022. - T. 2. – №. 10-2. - S. 528-533.)
Юлдашев Ф. А., Юлдашева М. Б. Формирование полноценно развитой личности на основе учений аль-Фараби //Психологическое благополучие современного человека. – 2019. – С. 71-74. (Yuldashev F. A., Yuldasheva M. B. Formation of a fully developed personality based on the teachings of al-Farabi //Psychological well-being of modern man. – 2019. – pp. 71-74.)
Юлдашев Ф. А. Теория познания аль-Фараби как фактор формирования национального человеческого капитала //Человеческий капитал как фактор социальной безопасности. – 2022. – С. 327-330. (Yuldashev F. A. Theory of knowledge of al-Farabi as a factor in the formation of national human capital //Human capital as a factor of social security. – 2022. – pp. 327-330.)
Юлдашев Ф. А., Юлдашева М. Б. Гносеологические аспекты концепции познания аль-Фараби в формировании ответственности личности //Социальная, профессиональная и персональная ответственность личности в современном обществе. – 2020. – С. 63-67 (Yuldashev F. A., Yuldasheva M. B. Epistemological aspects of the concept of cognition of al-Farabi in the formation of personal responsibility //Social, professional and personal responsibility of the individual in modern society. – 2020. – pp. 63-67)
