POSTNOKLASSIK ILMIY TAFAKKUR SHAKLLANISHIDA BILIM VA FAOLIYAT DIALEKTIKASINING O‘RNI

Xidirov Mustafo Toyirqulovich

doi:10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a42

Mualliflar

Xidirov Mustafo Toyirqulovich

O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-8548

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a42

Kalit so‘zlar:

postnoklassik tafakkur, fan, bilim, ilmiy bilish, faoliyat, dialektika, gnoseologiya, ontologiya, subyekt-obyekt munosabati, metodologiya, zamonaviy fan.

Annotatsiya

Ushbu maqolada postnoklassik ilmiy tafakkurning shakllanish jarayonida bilim va faoliyat dialektikasining zaruriyati metodologik asoslar bilan tahlil qilinadi. Bunda zamonaviy fanning ko‘p qirrali va murakkab xususiyatlari, subyekt-obyekt o‘rtasidagi interaktiv munosabatlar, gnoseologik va ontologik yondashuvlar integraциyasi asosida ilmiy bilish va amaliy faoliyatning uyg‘unlashuvi yoritiladi. Shuningdek, bilimni faoliyatga tatbiq qilish orqali nazariy va amaliy natijalarning muvofiqligiga erishish hamda inson tafakkurining yangi bosqichga o‘tishidagi metodologik asoslar tahlil qilinadi.

Muallif haqida

Xidirov Mustafo Toyirqulovich, O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti

O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti doktoranti

Adabiyotlar

1. Grinbaum A., & Paty M. Physics and metaphysics // Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. United Kingdom, 2003. – № 34(2). – P. 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00007-6

2. Кун Томас После «Структуры научных революций» / Томас Кун; пер. с англ. А.Л. Никифорова — Москва: ACT, 2014. – C. 162.

3. Thomas. S. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. – University of Chicago Press, 2012. – P – 264.

4. Лебедев С.А. Консенсуальная природа научных истин. Известия РАО, 2018, № 2, с. 5–17.

5. Лебедев С.А., Авдулов А.Н., Борзенков В.Г., Лазарев Ф.В., Лесков Л.В., Мирский Э.М., Юдин Б.Г. Основы философии науки. Москва, Академический проект, 2005. – 544 с

6. Shermuhamedоva N.A. Falsafa va fan metоdоlоgiyasi. Darslik. – T.: PUBLISHING HIGH FUTURE, 2024. – B. 81.

7. Лебедев С.А. Классическая, неклассическая и постнеклассическая методологии науки. Гуманитарный вестник. № 2•2019 file:///C:/Users/%D0%90%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80/Downloads/klassicheskaya-neklassicheskaya-i-postneklassicheskaya-metodologii-nauki.pdf

8. Grinbaum A., & Paty M. Physics and metaphysics // Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. United Kingdom, 2003. – № 34(2). – P. 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00007-6

9. Kline S.J. Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking. – USA: Stanford University Press, 1995. – P. 197.

10. Latour B. Pandoraʼs hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. – London: Harvard University Press, 1999. – P. 145.

11. Longino H.E. The Fate of Knowledge. – USA: Princeton University Press, 2001. – P. 50. (233)