POSTNOKLASSIK ILMIY TAFAKKUR SHAKLLANISHIDA BILIM VA FAOLIYAT DIALEKTIKASINING O‘RNI

Xidirov Mustafo Toyirqulovich

doi:10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a42

Authors

Xidirov Mustafo Toyirqulovich

O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-8548

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a42

Keywords:

Постнеклассическое мышление, наука, знание, научное познание, деятельность, диалектика, гносеология, онтология, отношение субъект-объект, методология, современная наука.

Abstract

This article analyzes the necessity of the dialectics of knowledge and activity in the formation of post-nonclassical scientific thinking, based on methodological foundations. It highlights the integration of scientific cognition and practical activity through the synthesis of epistemological and ontological approaches, considering the complexity and multidimensional nature of modern science and the interactive relationship between subject and object. The article also examines the methodological foundations for aligning theoretical and practical outcomes through the application of knowledge to activity, as well as for transitioning human thinking to a new stage.

Author Biography

Xidirov Mustafo Toyirqulovich, O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti

O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti doktoranti

References

1. Grinbaum A., & Paty M. Physics and metaphysics // Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. United Kingdom, 2003. – № 34(2). – P. 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00007-6

2. Кун Томас После «Структуры научных революций» / Томас Кун; пер. с англ. А.Л. Никифорова — Москва: ACT, 2014. – C. 162.

3. Thomas. S. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. – University of Chicago Press, 2012. – P – 264.

4. Лебедев С.А. Консенсуальная природа научных истин. Известия РАО, 2018, № 2, с. 5–17.

5. Лебедев С.А., Авдулов А.Н., Борзенков В.Г., Лазарев Ф.В., Лесков Л.В., Мирский Э.М., Юдин Б.Г. Основы философии науки. Москва, Академический проект, 2005. – 544 с

6. Shermuhamedоva N.A. Falsafa va fan metоdоlоgiyasi. Darslik. – T.: PUBLISHING HIGH FUTURE, 2024. – B. 81.

7. Лебедев С.А. Классическая, неклассическая и постнеклассическая методологии науки. Гуманитарный вестник. № 2•2019 file:///C:/Users/%D0%90%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80/Downloads/klassicheskaya-neklassicheskaya-i-postneklassicheskaya-metodologii-nauki.pdf

8. Grinbaum A., & Paty M. Physics and metaphysics // Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. United Kingdom, 2003. – № 34(2). – P. 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00007-6

9. Kline S.J. Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking. – USA: Stanford University Press, 1995. – P. 197.

10. Latour B. Pandoraʼs hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. – London: Harvard University Press, 1999. – P. 145.

11. Longino H.E. The Fate of Knowledge. – USA: Princeton University Press, 2001. – P. 50. (233)