This article explores theoretical approaches to understanding the communicative-pragmatic properties of irony, focusing on its linguistic and contextual dimensions. Irony, as a multifaceted communicative tool, operates in the interaction between literal and implied meanings, often relying on common knowledge and cultural symbols to fully understand the situation in the perception of the stylistic device of irony. The pragmatic meanings of irony in context are analyzed in speech acts, revealing the reality between the speaker, the listener and the speech process.
References
Балашов С. Н.. Когнитивная природа иронии: парадигма моделей в сопоставительном описании (на материале английских художественных произведений ХХ века и их русских переводов). Автореф. дисс… канд. филол. наук. – Екатеринбург, 2006. – С. 12.
Pfeifer, Valeria & Pexman, Penny. When It Pays to Be Insincere: On the Benefits of Verbal Irony//Current Directions in Psychological Science//2023. №33. 10.1177/09637214231205312.
Bromberek-Dyzman, K. Affective twist in irony processing. Humana//Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies//№5(23), 2012. –p. 83–111. https://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/ HM/article/view/164
Sullivan, K., Winner, E., & Hopfield, N. How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions//British Journal of Developmental Psychology//№13(2), 1995.–P.191–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/875 65641.2003.9651888
Pfeifer, Valeria & Pexman, Penny. When It Pays to Be Insincere: On the Benefits of Verbal Irony//Current Directions in Psychological Science//2023. №33. 10.1177/09637214231205312.
Muecke, D. C. The Compass of Irony. Taylor & Francis Limited, 2023. –p. 91-92. ISBN 978-0367655259.
Qazaqova N. G’afur G’ulom asarlarining pragmalingvistik tadqiqi: filol. fanlari nomz. diss. – Namangan, 2019. – B. 104.
Хакимов М. Ўзбек прагмалингвистикаси асослари. –Тошкент: Академнашр, 2013. –Б.104.
Austin, J.L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962. –P. 92-101.
