TILDA QIYOSLASH MUNOSABATINING IFODALANISHI

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF (English)
Nashr qilingan: sen 12, 2024
Kalit so‘zlar:
qiyosдфқр munosabatш, affiksokomparatema, leksokomparatema, morfokomparatema, sintaksokomparatema, tekstokomparatema, qiyosiy munosabatni ifodalovchi qo‘shma gaplar, qiyoslash mazmunidagi super-sintaktik butunliklik (SSB).

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Shirinxon Dadabayeva
Fergana State University
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1066-5310

Annotatsiya

Tilshunoslikda tilni murakkab tizim sifatida o‘rganish, barcha til birliklarini shakl va mazmunidan kelib chiqib tahlil qilish hamda sintaktik, semiotik va pragmatik tabiatini, nutqdagi ahamiyatini o‘rganish muhim ahamiyatga ega. Aynan turli munosabatlarni ifodalovchi til birliklarini tadqiq qilish tilshunoslikda nazariy va amaliy ahamiyatga ega, xususan, qiyoslash munosabatini ifodalovchi lingvistik vositalarni bir semantik guruhga birlashtirib, ma’lum bir tizim asosida ajratib ko‘rsatish imkonini beradi. Ushbu maqolaning asosiy maqsadi qiyosiy munosabatni turli darajalarda, asosan, sintaktik darajada ifodalovchi til birliklarini aniqlash va ularni turli tillar misolida tahlil qilishdan iborat. Ushbu maqolani yoritishda tavsif, tasnif, taqqoslash, qarama-qarshilik, mazmun va pragmatik tahlil kabi usullardan foydalanilgan.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak
Dadabayeva , S. (2024). TILDA QIYOSLASH MUNOSABATINING IFODALANISHI. Farg’ona Davlat Universiteti, 30(3), 221. Retrieved from https://journal.fdu.uz/index.php/sjfsu/article/view/4907
Maqola
№. 3 (2024): FarDU ilmiy xabarlari jurnali ilova to'plam (Ijtimoiy gumanitar fanlar)
Bo‘lim
Tilshunoslik
Creative Commons litsenziyasi

Tsya robota litsenzuetsya vydpovídno do Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 xalqaro litsenziyasi.

muallifning biografiyasi

Shirinxon Dadabayeva , Fergana State University

Farg‘ona davlat universiteti,filologiya fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori

Foydalaniladigan adabiyotlar

Abdurakhmanov. G. Bases of compound sentence syntax. - Tashkent: Science, 1958. - P.24-26.

Anokhina Yu.M. Ways of Expressing Comparisons in Languages with Different Grammatical Structures (Based on Russian and French Languages), Cand. . philol. Sciences. - Omsk, 2004. - P.14.

Dadabaeva Sh. Expression of the conceptual semantics of comparison in English and Uzbek through lexemes // Current issues of comparative studies, 2018, issue 1. - P.71-73.

Dixon R.M. Basic Linguistic Theory. Further Grammatical Topics. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. – Рр 345-353.

Hans J. Der steigernde Vergleich und sein sprachlicher Ausdruck // Indogermanische Forschungen 1934, Vol 52. – P.108-130.

Heine B. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. – Рр109-130 .

Hermann Z. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Comparation insbesondere der Comparationscasus der indogermanischen Sprachen und sein Ersatz. Berlin: Dümmler, 1884.

Introduction to public communication. Department of communication, Indiana State University. 2016. – Рр. 96-102.

Ivanova JI.A. Verbs as part of the functional-semantic field of equality (based on the Russian language): Dis. ... cand. philol. Sciences. - Ufa, 1990. - 26 p.

Khudoyberganova D. Semantic and stylistic features of assimilation structures in the Uzbek language: Diss. cand. philol. Sciences. – P. 30

Kolshansky G.B. Logic and structure of the language. - Moscow, 1965. - P. 81.

Kurbanova M, Yuldashev M. Text linguistics. - Tashkent: University, 2014. - P. 61.

Loseva L. M. How the text is built. - Moscow, 1980. – P. 63.

Mahmudov N. Semantic-syntactic asymmetry in simple sentences in the Uzbek language. - Tashkent: Teacher, 1984 - B. 65-71.

Mahmudov N., Nurmonov A. Theoretical grammar (syntax) of the Uzbek language. -Tashkent: Teacher, 1995. - P.92.

Mamajonov A. Syntactic stylistics. - Tashkent: Science, 1990. - B. 51-52.

Mamajonov A. Text Linguistics. - Tashkent, 1989. - P30.

Mukarramov M. Simile in Uzbek. - Tashkent: Science, 1976. - P.6-8.

Parret H. Pragmatics. Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics. – Berlin: De Gruyter. 1986. –751-760.

Potebnya A. A. From lectures on the theory of literature. Proverb. Proverb. - Kharkov: Peaceful Labor, 1914. - 164 p.

Safarov Sh. Pragmalinguistics. - Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, 2008. - 165 p.

Shoabdurahmonov Sh., Askarova M., Hojiev A. And others. Modern Uzbek literary language. - Tashkent: Teacher, 1980. - P.72-73.

Sidikova M.A. Functional - semantic pole comparison in Tajik and English languages: Diss. Philol. science - Dushanbe, 2018. - P.13.

Stassen L. Comparative constructions. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) //The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2013.

Ultan R. Some features of basic comparative constructions // Working Papers on Language Universals , 1972. Vol 9. – Рр.117-162.

Umarova N. Linguistic-conceptual study of Alisher Navoi's works: Phil. science. diss. - Fergana, 2021. - P. 131.

Umurquluv Z.B. Comparison in the literary text and its linguopoetic value: Philology. diss. - Termiz, 2020.

Yvonne Treis. Comparative Constructions: An Introduction. Linguistic Discovery, Dartmouth College Library // On the expression of comparison: Contributions to the typology of comparative constructions from lesser-known languages (guest editors: Yvonne Treis & Katarzyna I. Wojtylak), , 2018, Vol 16. – Рр. 1 - 26.