sg

Literature

No. 3 (2023): Scientific journal of the Fergana State University (Social humanities sciences)

THE STUDY OF SYNONYMY IN LINGUISTICS AND THE VIEWS OF SCIENTISTS ON ITS TYPES

Submitted
November 11, 2023
Published
2023-11-11

Abstract

The 20th century was a golden age for the field of synonymy. Famous linguists have created many works, adhering to a scientific approach to their views. As a result, data remained that can become a real school for linguists, researchers of our time. If in the created works the phenomenon of synonymy, synonymic relations, their types were written based on the requirements of that time, then at present they are one of the central issues in the field of semantics, and the definitions and classifications given by them have become more widespread than before. This article analyzes the views of world linguists on synonymy which is one of the semantic categories. Similarities and differences in the definitions and classifications are also given. It is considered that over the years, the scope of research has expanded, and the definitions of synonyms have become more refined.

References

  1. Cruse. А. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - 1986. – P.88. (Kruz A. Leksik semantika. Kembrij: Kembrij Universiteti Nashriyoti. 1986. – 88 b.)
  2. Lyons, J. Linguistic Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – 1995. P.25. (Layons J. Lingvistik Semantika. Kembrij: Kembrij Universiteti Nashriyoti. 1995. – 25 b.)
  3. Greenbaum, S. Oxford English Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press. - 1996. – P.420. (Grinbaum S. Oksford ingliz tili grammatikasi. Oksford: Oksford Universiteti Nashriyoti.– 1996. – 420 b.)
  4. Шмелев Д.Н. Современный русский язык: Лексика. М.: Просвещение- 1977. – С.55. (Shmelev D.N. Zamonaviy rus tili: Leksika. M.: Ma’rifat – 1977. – 55 b.)
  5. Розенталь Д. Э., Голуб И. Б., Теленкова М. А. Современный русский язык: Учебное пособие. 2-е изд. М.: Международные отношения, 1994. — 560 с. (Rozental D.E., Golub I.B., Telenkova M.A. Zamonaviy rus tili: Darslik. 2-nashr. M.: Xalqaro munosabatlar. 1994. – 560 b.)
  6. Александрова З.Е. Словарь синонимов русского языка. Москва. Издательство: Русский язык. 2001. С.6. (Aleksandrova Z.E. Rus tili sinonimlari lug‘ati. Moskva. Nashriyot: Rus tili. 2001. – 6 b.)
  7. Винокур Г.О. Проблема культуры речи. «Русский язык в советской школе» 1929. № 5. С. 82–92. (Vinokur G.O. Nutq madaniyati muammosi. «Sovet maktabidagi rus tili» 1929. № 5. 82–92 betlar.)
  8. Уфимцева А.А. Слово в лексико-семантической системе языка. – Москва: Наука, 1968. – с. 272. (Ufimtseva A.A. Tilning leksik-semantik tizimidagi so‘z. – Moskva: Fan. 1968. – 272 b.)
  9. Реформатский А.А. Введение в языковедение. - М.: Академия, 1997. – С.488. (Reformatskiy A.A. Tilshunoslikka kirish. – M.: Akademiya. 1997. – 488 b.)
  10. Lyons,J. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge Univeristy Press. - 1968. - P.450. (Layons J. Nazariy tilshunoslikka kirish. Kembrij Universiteti Nashriyoti. – 1968. – 450 b.)
  11. Мirtojiyev.М. O‘zbek tili semasiologiyasi. Toshkent. MUMTOZ SO‘Z. - 2010. – 191 b. (Mirtojiev M. Semasiology of the Uzbek language. Tashkent. Classic word. – 2010. – p.191.)
  12. Murphy, M. L. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and Other Paradigms. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press. - 2003. – P.155. (Merfi M.L. Semantik munosabatlar va leksika: antonimiya, sinonimiya va boshqa paradigmalar. Nyu-York: Kembrij universiteti matbioti. 2003. – 155 b.)