logo
O‘zbekcha

THE CHARISMATIC IMAGE OF THE SPEAKER IN PUBLIC SPEECH

Authors

  • Гульчехра Давлятова

    Ферганского государственного университета

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a99

Keywords:

speech charisma, linguistic creativity, rhetorical strategies, conceptual metaphor, frame semantics, ethos; logos, pathos.

Abstract

The article examines the linguo-creative strategies through which an orator constructs and sustains a charismatic image in public speech. The empirical basis consists of two Russian authors — Joseph Brodsky (fragments of the Nobel Lecture, 1987) and Alexander Solzhenitsyn (fragments of the Harvard speech A World Split Apart, 1978). The theoretical framework is based on frame semantics (C. Fillmore), the theory of conceptual metaphor (G. Lakoff, M. Johnson), and the “new rhetoric” (Ch. Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca). The results section presents a microlinguistic analysis of specific sentences, showing how metaphorical reframing, paradoxical definition, aphoristic compression, gradation, and deictic densification organize the ethos, logos, and pathos of speech. It is shown that charisma is articulated not “psychologically” but discursively — as the effect of the coordinated functioning of cognitive and rhetorical mechanisms.

The article examines the linguo-creative strategies through which an orator constructs and sustains a charismatic image in public speech. The empirical basis consists of two Russian authors — Joseph Brodsky (fragments of the Nobel Lecture, 1987) and Alexander Solzhenitsyn (fragments of the Harvard speech A World Split Apart, 1978). The theoretical framework is based on frame semantics (C. Fillmore), the theory of conceptual metaphor (G. Lakoff, M. Johnson), and the “new rhetoric” (Ch. Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca). The results section presents a microlinguistic analysis of specific sentences, showing how metaphorical reframing, paradoxical definition, aphoristic compression, gradation, and deictic densification organize the ethos, logos, and pathos of speech. It is shown that charisma is articulated not “psychologically” but discursively — as the effect of the coordinated functioning of cognitive and rhetorical mechanisms.

Author Biography

  • Гульчехра Давлятова, Ферганского государственного университета

    кандидат педагогических наук, профессор Ферганский государственный университет, кафедры русской филологии

References

1. Арутюнова Н.Д. Дискурс // Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь / гл. ред. В.Н. Ярцева. — М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1990. — С. 136–137.

2. Бродский И.А. Нобелевская лекция (1987) // Официальный русский текст Нобелевского фонда. — Электронный ресурс. (Доступ подтверждён онлайн) .

3. Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. — Волгоград: Перемена, 2002. — 477 с.

4. Перельман Х., Ольбрехт Тытека Л. Новая риторика. Трактат об аргументatsiи / перевод и комментарии С. Э. Зверев. — СПб.: Алетейя, 2024. — 711 с.

5. Солженицын А.И. Речь в Гарварде «Расколотый мир» (1978) // Русский текст. — Электронный ресурс.

6. Ширяев Е.Н. Культура русской речи: Энциклопедический словарь / отв. ред. Л.К. Граудина, Е.Н. Ширяев. — М.: Academia, 1998. — 384 с. Википедия

7. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By / transl. from English by A.N. Baranova, A.V. Morozova; ed. and foreword by A. N. Baranova. — Moscow: URSS, 2004. — 252 p.

8. Fillmore C.J. Frame Semantics // Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981. — Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., 1982. — P. 111–137.

9. Давлятова Г.Н. Лингвокреативные способности оратора как харизматической личности.// Международная научно-практическая конференция «Риторика в мировом пространстве: наука, образование, практика». – Фергана, 2023. – С. 29-34.

10. Давлятова Г.Н. Основы риторики.// Учебник. – Фергана, 2022. – 140 с.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

THE CHARISMATIC IMAGE OF THE SPEAKER IN PUBLIC SPEECH. (2026). Scientific Journal of the Fergana State University, 31(5), 99. https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss5/a99