sg

Scientific information

No. 2 (2025): FarDU.Ilmiy xabarlar jurnali (Aniq fanlar)

THE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACTIVITIES

Submitted
July 23, 2025
Published
2025-07-28

Abstract

This article comprehensively analyzes the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in scientific research. Using systematic review methods, the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods in scientific processes, the advantages and limitations of using generative AI tools (ChatGPT, Gemini, Scispace, Perplexity) are discussed. The results show that AI technologies provide significant advances in working with big data, advancing scientific hypotheses, and automating laboratory processes. However, issues such as algorithmic bias, the "black box" problem, hallucinations, plagiarism, confidentiality, and copyright continue to concern the scientific community. In particular, this article puts forward recommendations for the full and rational use of AI, ensuring transparency and fairness in scientific processes, and operating within the rules of scientific ethics.

References

  1. Briganti, G., & Le Moine, O. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Today and Tomorrow. Frontiers in Medicine, 7, 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00027
  2. Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018). The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 23(6), 1241–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.010
  3. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2023). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. (Accessed December 21, 2023).
  4. Elbadawi, M., Li, H., Basit, A. W., & Gaisford, S. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in generating original scientific research. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 652, 123741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123741
  5. Heidt, A. (2025, April 7). AI for research: the ultimate guide to choosing the right tool. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01069-0
  6. Liverpool, L. (2023). AI intensifies fight against “paper mills” that churn out fake research. Nature, 618(7964), 222–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01780-w
  7. Nature Editorial. (2023). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature, 613(7945), 612. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
  8. Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
  9. Smeds, M. R., Mendes, B., O’Banion, L. A., & Shalhub, S. (2023). Exploring the pros and cons of using artificial intelligence in manuscript preparation for scientific journals. Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques, 9(2), 101163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101163
  10. Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(7945), 620–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>